Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 13:39:48 -0700 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> Cc: "Piotr P. Stefaniak" <pstef@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 62d42655bca1 - main - usb(4): Substitute "unsigned int" using the equivalent and shorter "unsigned" keyword. Message-ID: <Y0COlJ1xrcT8zanb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <bf9cae46-5d31-e676-2640-c6b49cfdd902@selasky.org> References: <202210071141.297BfcjN071407@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <Y0ASC9OXKP19xkSz@freefall.freebsd.org> <d7d3b1ef-1afe-bb84-d61c-031b3dff94c2@selasky.org> <Y0AnxWRAH7detuol@freefall.freebsd.org> <bf9cae46-5d31-e676-2640-c6b49cfdd902@selasky.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 04:21:01PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: H> >>> Why? Just because it's shorter? H> >> H> >> Yes, just because "int" is the redundant. H> > H> > Definitely that's true for computers. In case of humans it's debatable. H> H> Would uint32_t be more clear? IMHO, it definitely will be more clear. -- Gleb Smirnoff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Y0COlJ1xrcT8zanb>