Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 22:13:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu> To: Font <font@Mcs.Net> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: option NETATALK in 2.2.5R Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971024221252.7229G-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.971024023740.9030A-100000@Jupiter.Mcs.Net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 24 Oct 1997, Font wrote: > FYI: > > I added "option NETATALK" to a kernel configuration file that, aside from > having a number of network and disk devices commented out, was > substantially unchanged from GENERIC. This resulted in a kernel file that > was 2512988 bytes, a much larger number than was expected (GENERIC is > 1457189). This resulting kernel file hung as soon as the kernel was > loaded (it never got to process -c flags). I haven't yet compiled the > netatalk software itself on this system (P200, 32M, 3C509, wd0 only). I can't say I'm having the same problem. I'm running a well changed GENERIC with NETATALK. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.971024221252.7229G-100000>