Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 7 May 2003 14:39:33 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        John Stockdale <jstockdale@stanford.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: DDB, INVARIENTS, WITNESS and derivatives
Message-ID:  <20030507213933.GA10841@rot13.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <001101c314de$2e8d8e30$3d2c0c80@quenya>
References:  <001101c314de$2e8d8e30$3d2c0c80@quenya>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 02:18:18PM -0700, John Stockdale wrote:
> Just wondering if there is any reason to still be building the
> 5.0-Current kernel with DDB, INVARIENTS, INVARIENT_SUPPORT, WITNESS, and
> WITNESS_SKIPSPIN. I'd rather remove the debugging for speed, but not if
> it will break things (like I remember the report being a little while
> back).

Yes, to assist with debugging during the 5.1 release cycle :-)

Kris

--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+uX0VWry0BWjoQKURAm5mAKDypHjab6oU4W6/Zkm1m658Xmms9QCg+y9a
5KpbT2b/78HBdaFXuuM1y7g=
=K8Gq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030507213933.GA10841>