Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:42:39 -0400
From:      Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, Robert Noland <rnoland@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [HEADSUP] amd64 suspend/resume code to be comitted
Message-ID:  <200903120942.44149.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <1236836518.1651.0.camel@wombat.2hip.net>
References:  <200903111233.14029.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <200903111507.42241.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <1236836518.1651.0.camel@wombat.2hip.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 12 March 2009 01:41 am, Robert Noland wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 15:07 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 March 2009 02:52 pm, Robert Noland wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 12:33 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > > > With popular demands, I will commit the following patch in
> > > > next few days unless a showstopper is found or
> > > > "over-my-dead-body" type of review is received. ;-)
> > > >
> > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/amd64_suspend-20090311.diff
> > > >
> > > > FYI, it was originally posted here:
> > > >
> > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200810211228.31028.jkim
> > > >
> > > > and here:
> > > >
> > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200812102120.03788.jkim
> > > >
> > > > Please read the original threads for more information about
> > > > the patch.
> > >
> > > Does this address SMP as well?  Or is that still hanging out in
> > > the wind?
> >
> > Yes, it does.
>
> Cool, looking forward to it...

Wait a minute.  Are you talking about SMP i386?  If so, the answer to 
that question is no although it will be relatively easy to do fix 
after the patch.  This patch only address UP/SMP amd64.

Jung-uk Kim



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200903120942.44149.jkim>