Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 00:35:27 -0700 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, Matt Dillon <dillon@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Building klds (was: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/include param.h src/sys/alpha/include param.h src/sys/conf options src/sys/i386/conf LINT) Message-ID: <199909240735.AAA02032@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 23 Sep 1999 14:17:50 %2B0930." <19990923141749.U42271@freebie.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Wednesday, 22 September 1999 at 22:46:25 -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > In message <19990923093300.W7337@freebie.lemis.com> Greg Lehey writes: > > : This really points out a basic deficiency of the current build > > : process: klds should be built along with the kernel, not along with > > : userland, and they should have access to the kernel config files. > > > > Which config file? I routinely run with 5 different ones on the same > > machine.... > > The one with which they're associated. The way I see it, they should > get built along with the kernel. If you have a KLD that's vulernable to option changes in the kernel proper, it's a sure sign that the interface you're using is broken and needs to be fixed. -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909240735.AAA02032>