Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 16 Feb 2019 10:08:32 -0700
From:      Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
To:        Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>
Cc:        src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r344188 - in head: lib/libc/sys sys/vm
Message-ID:  <259b30371291398891b48c38fc8231e7422f47e4.camel@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190217011341.S833@besplex.bde.org>
References:  <201902152336.x1FNaNUo039321@repo.freebsd.org> <20190217011341.S833@besplex.bde.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2019-02-17 at 02:58 +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> Slowness is relative.  In FreeBSD-1, floppy disk devices were still in
> use and were especially slow.  Now hard disks are slow relative to fast
> SSDs.  But the number of buffers was unchanged.  It is still essentially
> unchanged except for vn pager pbufs.  The hard disks can complete 128
> i/o's for a full queue much faster than a floppy disk, so the relative
> slowness might be similar, but now there are more subsystems and some
> systems have many more disks.

The modern replacement for a floppy disk in this regard is an sdcard.
When doing large numbers of random writes, such as untarring a snapshot
of rootfs to a ufs filesystem on sdcard, gstat will show ms/w values
anywhere from 30,000 to 90,000 depending on the card. It stays that way
throughout the operation, and IO to all other disks on the system
essentially comes to a standstill. This is true whether the card is in
a native sdhci controller or a usb-attached multiformat reader/burner.

-- Ian




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?259b30371291398891b48c38fc8231e7422f47e4.camel>