Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:32:48 -0400 
From:      Nick Evans <nevans@talkpoint.com>
To:        'Brent Wiese ' <brently@bjwcs.com>, Nick Evans <nevans@talkpoint.com>, "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org '" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: 2.7 Terabyte array and bsdlabel on 5.3-BETA2 wierdness
Message-ID:  <294123FE9E76C34193EF7019BAAE4B2C124E4A@postal.talkpoint.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 The card is a 9500-12 despite the driver saying otherwise. The array is
built at 2.7T through the 3ware bios. bsdlabel just refuses to accept a
label larger than 700-something gig.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brent Wiese
To: 'Nick Evans'; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: 9/1/04 8:12 PM
Subject: RE: 2.7 Terabyte array and bsdlabel on 5.3-BETA2 wierdness

> dmesg: 
> 
> 3ware device driver for 9000 series storage controllers, 
> version: 2.50.00.000
> twa0: <3ware 9000 series Storage Controller> port 
> 0xc800-0xc8ff mem 0xfb800000-0xfbffffff,0xfe9ffc00-0xf

Pre-9500 controllers have a hardware limit of 2TB per RAID volume.
Likely
that's your issue.

And, before you decide to break it into 2 RAID volumes, be aware the
highly
optimized and blazing fast performance is *only* on the first volume.
Additional volumes are very slow. Its something 3ware doesn't advertise
but
will usually admit to if confronted.

Brent



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?294123FE9E76C34193EF7019BAAE4B2C124E4A>