Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 03:16:07 GMT From: Scott Robison <scott@casaderobison.com> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: misc/175394: Suggested addition to termcap database Message-ID: <201301180316.r0I3G7ug065597@red.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201301180320.r0I3K0LN020815@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 175394
>Category: misc
>Synopsis: Suggested addition to termcap database
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: maintainer-update
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Fri Jan 18 03:20:00 UTC 2013
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Scott Robison
>Release: 9.1
>Organization:
>Environment:
FreeBSD dev.isdr.net 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue Dec 4 09:23:10 UTC 2012 root@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
>Description:
I hope I got the class right, and this is not a bug so much as a request for enhancement.
The termcap database includes a definition for PuTTY that looks like this:
putty|vt220-color|vt220-co|vt220 emulator with ANSI colors:\
:pa#64:Co#8:AF=\E[3%dm:AB=\E[4%dm:op=\E[39;49m\E[m:tc=vt220:
This is good and works nicely, but does not support the full 256 color palette that PuTTY supports.
>How-To-Repeat:
Not really a problem. Just a suggestion for a new termcap entry.
>Fix:
I've added the following two lines to my termcap:
putty-256color:\
:pa#32767:Co#256:tc=putty:
It seems to work acceptably. Ultimately of course, I don't care if my suggestion is the official definition, I'd just like one that works. :^)
Thanks!
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201301180316.r0I3G7ug065597>