Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 19:02:08 +0200 From: Alexander Langer <alex@FreeBSD.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/qpopper Makefile ports/mail/qpopper/patchespatch-manpages ports/mail/qpopper/pkg MESSAGE PLISTports/mail/qpopper/scripts pre-install Message-ID: <20000719190208.B17793@cichlids.cichlids.com> In-Reply-To: <200007191637.KAA82176@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 10:37:00AM -0600 References: <20000719100926.A14534@cichlids.cichlids.com> <200007190731.AAA03974@freefall.freebsd.org> <39756134.DC76C6B7@FreeBSD.org> <20000719100926.A14534@cichlids.cichlids.com> <200007191637.KAA82176@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Warner Losh (imp@village.org): > : > Please rename patch-manpages according to out patchnaming rules (patch-xx) and > : No. > Why not? The request seemed reasonable. Well, actually I explained on -ports why I think this names are better. BTW: It's changed in the meanwhile, in order to keep the history of the patches. Alex -- cat: /home/alex/.sig: No such file or directory To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000719190208.B17793>