Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 00:20:29 +0100 From: Bjoern Fischer <bfischer@Techfak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Bjoern Fischer <bfischer@Techfak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bridged interfaces don't see broadcasts Message-ID: <20020115232029.GC3520@frolic.no-support.loc> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0201151456530.82675-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> References: <20020115224933.GB3520@frolic.no-support.loc> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0201151456530.82675-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:58:04PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> ok..
> I'll see if I can come up with a way to hook multiple netgraph nodes to an
> ethernet node...
Thank you. I don't know if it does matter, but neither ed1 nor vr0 is
involved in pppoe, so the example in /usr/share/examples/netgraph/ether.bri=
dge
should be fully applicable. The pppoe interface is ed0, this is the node li=
st
when not using netgraph bridging:
There are 7 total nodes:
Name: ngctl8544 Type: socket ID: 00000007 Num hooks: 0
Name: <unnamed> Type: pppoe ID: 00000006 Num hooks: 2
Name: <unnamed> Type: socket ID: 00000005 Num hooks: 1
Name: vlan0 Type: ether ID: 00000004 Num hooks: 0
Name: ed1 Type: ether ID: 00000003 Num hooks: 0
Name: ed0 Type: ether ID: 00000002 Num hooks: 1
Name: vr0 Type: ether ID: 00000001 Num hooks: 0
> (but since my daughter was born yesterday I'm a little deistracted at the
> moment :-)
Conratulations and best wishes. Uh, no need to, umm, disrupt
your distraction. ;-)
-Bj=F6rn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020115232029.GC3520>