Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 00:20:25 +0200 From: Andreas Kohn <andreas.kohn@gmx.net> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: re@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Scheduler change Message-ID: <1094595624.845.13.camel@klamath.ankon.de.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <413E3058.50708@samsco.org> References: <413E20FC.80801@samsco.org> <1094593528.845.11.camel@klamath.ankon.de.eu.org> <413E3058.50708@samsco.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 00:04, Scott Long wrote: > Andreas Kohn wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 22:58, Scott Long wrote: > > > >>All, > >> > >>In the interest of getting RELENG_5 stable and ready for 5.3, we are > >>going to switch the scheduler in 6-CURRENT from SCHED_ULE to SCHED_4BSD. > > > > Wouldn't it make more sense to only switch in RELENG_5, and leave it as > > default in HEAD? > > Or would it complicate testing and current work too much? > > > > Regards, > > Andreas > > > > (This questions basically comes from an interest in good QA and RE > > practices) > > > > We are trying to keep HEAD as a good test-bed for future RELENG_5 fixes. > It's hard to get broad testing of scheduler related things if HEAD and > RELENG_5 are using different schedulers. We also want to see HEAD be > stable enough to develop and test non-scheduler related things too. > > Scott Ah, thank you. -- Andreas [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBPjQoYucd7Ow1ygwRAmmmAJ92WLAgBw5oKBEnMogf4fPXylQyMwCeKqpL 1qVVSqTJnhQzsj7V38VKaJg= =Rt4k -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1094595624.845.13.camel>