Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 23:33:04 +1000 From: Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com> To: Yuri Pankov <yp@xvoid.org>, bcran@freebsd.org, darkfiberiru@gmail.com, ryan@freqlabs.com Cc: Clay Daniels <clay.daniels.jr@gmail.com>, David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 13.0-CURRENT r356767 wanted ZFS Message-ID: <CAOc73CCpsooetObw5FVy%2BZ-W80t=0S9F2NwSE7TObE%2BatrvP8A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOc73CAGs4UwD3Atx%2BcPALUHe2U97%2BoNLoe8NJGJBmNrEhX8BQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAGLDxTWe1BmiH5og0ZS1_RL%2BsLB3Ww48dwOSwmQ6GjPB0yrAHg@mail.gmail.com> <20200117002639.GM1192@albert.catwhisker.org> <59e98ff2-57c2-f618-643b-f73436149061@xvoid.org> <CAOc73CAGs4UwD3Atx%2BcPALUHe2U97%2BoNLoe8NJGJBmNrEhX8BQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 17:24, Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:18:41AM +0000, Clay Daniels wrote: > >> >> 13.0-CURRENT r356767 would not take NO for an answer, and kept up a >> loop >> >> until I gave up trying to use UFS. No big deal, seems to work fine... >> >> >> >> Clay >> > > It does seem like this could be related to my commit (see below). Althoug= h > I runtime tested installs with both ZFS and UFS options, so I=E2=80=99m s= urprised. > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/356758 > > I=E2=80=99ll try to have a look at it tonight. > > Regards, > Ben > Hi Clay, Thanks for reporting this issue. I was able to replicate it using bsdinstall on the latest snapshot ISO FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20200116-r356767-disc1.iso. It turns out the commit that introduced the regression was r356740. I have submitted a fix for review here: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23232 Regards, Ben -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOc73CCpsooetObw5FVy%2BZ-W80t=0S9F2NwSE7TObE%2BatrvP8A>