Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 19:54:49 -0500 From: "C J Michaels" <cjm2@earthling.net> To: <rjn103s@mgr3.k12.mo.us>, <Chris.Smith@raytheon.co.uk> Cc: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: Is anyone using FreeBSD and samba with multiple interfaces on a single subnet? Message-ID: <NDBBILKDCLLECBCLPMBIAEAPCAAA.cjm2@earthling.net> In-Reply-To: <00022912022900.18282@redmobile>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Why not have 2 separate configuration files. One for each interface, and start smbd and nmbd with the -s configfile option? -Chris -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Support Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 12:57 PM To: Chris.Smith@raytheon.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is anyone using FreeBSD and samba with multiple interfaces on a single subnet? Greetings, On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Chris.Smith@raytheon.co.uk wrote: > Hi, > > IMHO Sounds like a bad idea. Why do you need two IF's? I would like to distribute the load of some network apps (if possible) and guarentee that there is no congestion at the server nic 3com905 100 fulldplx. Server is connected to a 100mbs switched backbone. i.e. a switched pipe to each card. Like having all accounting apps on nic 1 and general apps on nic 2 and so on... Ideas of a better way or thoughts welcome. > > Chris Smith > Raytheon Systems Limited -- Richard Nelson Try Something Without GPF's - - Not To Mention The Cost:) FreeBSD http://www.freebsd.org RedHat http://www.redhat.com Strong Supporter of Visual Tcl http://www.neuron.com/stewart/vtcl/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?NDBBILKDCLLECBCLPMBIAEAPCAAA.cjm2>