Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 15:54:25 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposed minor mod to openssh for interactive operation Message-ID: <v04210103b5fe97d648bf@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <200009300023.e8U0NUW20137@earth.backplane.com> References: <200009300023.e8U0NUW20137@earth.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 5:23 PM -0700 9/29/00, Matt Dillon wrote: > At the moment openssh only turns on TCP_NODELAY etc if it > thinks you are creating an interactive shell, based on > whether it allocates a pty or not. > > Unfortunately, I have an application (and I expect this > would be useful generally) which uses a ssh link between > two programs interactively. > That is, send command, wait response, send command, wait > response. Delaying packets is a bad idea and cuts > performance over the link by about 20%. Would it be more appropriate to use stunnel (in ports) instead of an ssh connection for your application? (I'm just wondering...) --- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or drosih@rpi.edu Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?v04210103b5fe97d648bf>