Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 15:06:34 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Regarding tcpdump and plip Message-ID: <19990208150634.A10137@relay.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <19990208222829.53422@breizh.prism.uvsq.fr>; from Nicolas Souchu on Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 10:28:29PM %2B0100 References: <xzp90e9brl4.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <199902080148.RAA09054@dingo.cdrom.com> <19990208195855.56187@breizh.prism.uvsq.fr> <xzpsocg63t5.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <19990208222829.53422@breizh.prism.uvsq.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> +# Parallel port bus framework with nlpt (printer), plip (network).
What does ``nlpt'' stand for? If "New LPT" or something similarly
useless, then can't we keep the "lpt" name that is standard across PCs
and just change the usage to:
device lpt0 at ppbus?
The number of name changes for devices in FreeBSD is reaching an alarming
rate, messes with POLA, and many are simply gratuitous.
--
-- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990208150634.A10137>