Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 17:51:38 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 257989] Traffic shaper unable to perform beyond 1Gbit/s limit Message-ID: <bug-257989-7501-jy7VhTXGNk@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-257989-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-257989-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D257989 --- Comment #7 from Franco Fichtner <franco@opnsense.org> --- As far as Kristof's line of argumentation is concerned I'll take note of the hostility that has (elsewhere) never sparked any useful result in the past.= I don't blame him and I know where this is coming from. ;) I do get what you are asking, but if we as a core team try to force hours of qualifying user reports for at least 67 upstream projects of varying scope = and source code and complexity and rules without any pledge of hand-over is a w= aste of time between involved projects. That's also assuming we don't spend any time on our own code. It's not a realistic attitude. But as I said I agree that reporters need to do more here if you let them. The only project that gave such a pledge is Suricata and they did include a= ll of FreeBSD because of it making it a tier 1 priority. I've personally seen issues lay dormant for years, patch-ready reports time out, committers nowhere to be found (src and ports alike(. If this wasn't = the case I wouldn't try to argue here that this is one step below, but it is. Cheers, Franco --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-257989-7501-jy7VhTXGNk>