Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 07:02:58 +1000 (EST) From: jason andrade <jason@dstc.edu.au> To: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: freebsd alpha packages Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.20.0202200659540.26789-100000@azure.dstc.edu.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, i've been doing some updating locally - what is the status of freebsd alpha packages ? it looks like the packages-4-stable tree has been updated recently, but i'm now quite confused as to how these things are working for alpha and i386. on i386 (as i was corrected some weeks ago) there is packages-4-stable -> (symlink to) packages-4.5-release on alpha there is packages-4.5-release -> (symlink to) packages-4-stable so they're exactly opposite in behaviour. on alpha the packages-4-stable tree appears to have fixed the problems with packages being generated into more than the All/ directory, but there is also a packages-5-current tree there that hasn't been updated since september 2001.. any reason for this ? particularly since packages in the alpha ports tree points at the packages-5-current tree (unlike i386, where it points at packages-4-stable!) regards, -jason To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.4.20.0202200659540.26789-100000>