Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 08:45:52 +0200 (EET) From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@freebsd.org> To: kris@obsecurity.org (Kris Kennaway) Cc: lioux@uol.com.br (Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira), freebsd-current@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make.conf lack of CPUTYPE=k6-3 support Message-ID: <200103120646.f2C6kjp84242@vic.sabbo.net> In-Reply-To: <20010311221242.A842@mollari.cthul.hu> from "Kris Kennaway" at Mar 11, 2001 10:12:42 PM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:29:58AM -0300, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wr= > ote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > Is there anything against adding support for > > k6-3 to the just added CPUTYPE mechanism? :) > > My little machine feels left out. Hehehhe > > I made a simple patch to etc/defaults/make.conf > > and share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk > > Should I have touched anything else? > >=20 > > Regards, > >=20 > > ps: I think this can be MFCed asap (even during the > > veil period) since it is very straightforward. > > Looks fine to me. I'll commit it. I see no reason for it. k6-3 is essentially k6-2 core with extra cache on chip. Threre are no other significant differencies in the features or instruction set. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103120646.f2C6kjp84242>