Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 14:51:28 -0500 From: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> To: Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org> Cc: "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r321477 - head/sys/net Message-ID: <CAFMmRNwrN3BO6k2RmreGh-4pOxxrSGYt=YOpLGm=2ASaQMZyXg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201707251441.v6PEfocM030334@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201707251441.v6PEfocM030334@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org> wrote: > Author: sbruno > Date: Tue Jul 25 14:41:50 2017 > New Revision: 321477 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/321477 > > Log: > Don't hold the RM lock during lagg_proto_addport() to avoid an LOR. Can lagg_proto_addport() really be safely called without a lock held? That seems extremely dubious to me.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFMmRNwrN3BO6k2RmreGh-4pOxxrSGYt=YOpLGm=2ASaQMZyXg>