Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 14:20:06 +0530 From: Nikhil Dharashivkar <nikhildharashivkar@gmail.com> To: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding new option to ktrace Message-ID: <17db6d3a05090601501cb43d96@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <17db6d3a050906014048e2045b@mail.gmail.com> References: <17db6d3a0509051000622868bc@mail.gmail.com> <431C8D5B.7080309@samsco.org> <431C92F2.9090104@persistent.co.in> <431C93DD.20402@samsco.org> <17db6d3a0509052203b1da14a@mail.gmail.com> <20050906081855.GA26550@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <17db6d3a050906014048e2045b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry it's struct bio instead of struct dio.
On 9/6/05, Nikhil Dharashivkar <nikhildharashivkar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, it is ok if i loose data in ktrace queue when crash occurs.
> Basically, I want to give an Disk IO trace support to ktrace on
> FreeBSD.
> So, what I am thinking to use struct dio in dastrategy
> routine to trace the IO.
> I 'll use this struct to generate ktr_request. Throught
> ktr_writerequest it will be written in ktrace.out .
> Is it possible ?
>=20
>=20
>=20
> On 9/6/05, Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-Sep-06 10:33:53 +0530, Nikhil Dharashivkar wrote:
> > > Thanks for replying me. Basically what happend, while testing
> > >scsi driver on freebsd, at some point it crashes. So, there is no way
> > >to know how much IO is performed. To know the IO state just before the
> > >driver fails, i selected ktrace to print IO information whatever i ll
> > >get from dastrategy routine.
> >
> > It's not clear how ktrace is going to help here. The ktrXXX(9)
> > functions place ktr_request events in a queue. A kernel thread then
> > dumps the queue entries into a file via the normal buffer cache. The
> > data on disk is typically about 30 seconds behind real time. If the
> > system crashes, you will lose any events that are still in the buffer
> > cache or ktr_todo queue.
> >
> > Another problem is that since ktrace generates disk I/O, it is likely
> > to disturb your testing.
> >
> > A better approach would seem to be to build a circular buffer and
> > store the I/O requests in the buffer. When the system crashes, you
> > can look at the last entries in the buffer.
> >
> > --
> > Peter Jeremy
> >
>=20
>=20
> --
> Thanks and Regards,
> Nikhil.
>=20
--=20
Thanks and Regards,
Nikhil.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17db6d3a05090601501cb43d96>