Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:36:55 -0300 From: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <unixmania@gmail.com> To: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r205014 - in head: . sys/amd64/amd64 sys/amd64/conf sys/amd64/include sys/amd64/linux32 sys/compat/freebsd32 sys/compat/ia32 sys/conf sys/fs/procfs sys/ia64/conf sys/ia64/ia64 sys/ia64/... Message-ID: <e71790db1003120436u34370f40x64a72da41893a39a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201003111449.o2BEn6QY069179@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201003111449.o2BEn6QY069179@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> wrote: > Author: nwhitehorn > Date: Thu Mar 11 14:49:06 2010 > New Revision: 205014 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/205014 > > Log: > =A0Provide groundwork for 32-bit binary compatibility on non-x86 platform= s, > =A0for upcoming 64-bit PowerPC and MIPS support. This renames the COMPAT_= IA32 > =A0option to COMPAT_FREEBSD32, removes some IA32-specific code from MI pa= rts > =A0of the kernel and enhances the freebsd32 compatibility code to support > =A0big-endian platforms. COMPAT_FREEBSD32 is an unfortunate choice. It can be easily interpreted as "compatible with FreeBSD 3.2". Something like "COMPAT_32BIT" would be more meaningful. --=20 Not so young, but still crying out Full of anger full of doubt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e71790db1003120436u34370f40x64a72da41893a39a>