Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 15:58:37 +1100 From: Ruben Schade <newsgroups@rubenschade.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Migrating ZFS on Linux pools to FreeBSD Message-ID: <n9brlu$fl5$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <CALfReyci=FrU_=ijSDbHZqb1VenxGHxv36bdJdQqZVGmWXb9Ag@mail.gmail.com> References: <n8u4d0$2gj$1@ger.gmane.org> <56B30C42.1030006@FreeBSD.org> <86lh707dbr.fsf@WorkBox.Home> <CALfReyci=FrU_=ijSDbHZqb1VenxGHxv36bdJdQqZVGmWXb9Ag@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew, Brandon, Krad and Anders, Thanks for all your tips, really appreciated. Fortunately, I had the luck without hindsight to set flags for my ZFS pools that were compatible with FreeBSD, confirmed by using the FreeBSD boot media and attaching from a shell. I'm running 10.2-RELEASE now, and my pools work great. On 5/02/2016 2:21 am, krad wrote: > to add a bit more, both kernels use the same zfs core code, as do most > illumos based OS's. So there shouldn't be compatibility issues as others > have said as long as the feature flags supported by the kernel are = or > > the pool versions. Today I learned, thanks :) A real bummer Solaris is in the hands of Oracle now (well, pre-fork). GELI works fine, but native ZFS encryption and the other features since Solaris 11 on *BSD and illumos would be great. -- Cheers, Ruben Schade in s/Singapore/Sydney/ https://rubenerd.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?n9brlu$fl5$1>