Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:41:24 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/security Makefile Makefile.inc Message-ID: <20031110193637.G2547@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <xzp8ymobq1s.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200311081756.hA8HusgO090591@repoman.freebsd.org> <xzp8ymobq1s.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > Log: > > Makefile.inc wasn't needed; this is a left-over of other files presen= t > > in share/security in the trustedbsd_sebsd branch that are not present > > in the main tree. Also, .include Makefile.inc from the parent direct= ory > > so that BINDIR is set right. > > Doesn't that .include happen automatically? Yes. There are bad examples throughout src/share (../Makefile.inc is mostly not used, and at least the use of it in src/share/man/Makefile is bogus). A bad example was followed. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031110193637.G2547>