Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 11:20:53 +0100 From: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" <simon@nitro.dk> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ulrich_Sp=F6rlein?= <uqs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doceng@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Conversion to SVN Message-ID: <12F4B555-D14F-492C-9AC7-669BA33A0AF6@nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <20111007141312.GJ26743@acme.spoerlein.net> References: <20111007141312.GJ26743@acme.spoerlein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7 Oct 2011, at 15:13, Ulrich Sp=F6rlein wrote: > What I, personally, would like to see is us using the same svn repo as > src. That means we would have to stop svn.freebsd.org for the > conversion, turn off email sending, dump 50k revisions into it (under > /doc and /www perhaps? where should branches/tags end up?), then turn > everything back on. The advantages of having one repo need to be significant as the = disadvantages are certainly there. For svn to perform in the current = setup all of the repo basically need to fit into RAM - one large repo = makes this harder as we can't split on multiple servers as needed later. Also, please think of ports - I really doubt src and ports will fit into = same repo nicely... I'm not really sure where you would fit doc into the current repo... = head/ etc. is on the top level. --=20 Simon L. B. Nielsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12F4B555-D14F-492C-9AC7-669BA33A0AF6>