Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 08:54:59 +0200 From: Gerrit =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChn?= <gerrit.kuehn@aei.mpg.de> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: NFS on 10G interfaces still painfully slow Message-ID: <20160803085459.273a26404c4d37ee6b7e2b6f@aei.mpg.de> In-Reply-To: <31939_1470204015_57A1886F_31939_1565_1_20160803075954.35914021394d6c3f9b3802f3@aei.mpg.de> References: <20160802104929.a10602a4786c68b4547a45b9@aei.mpg.de> <CAOtMX2hTGkm68rY7=hWDNG6YeuE-xd4%2BrV7%2BLoaywaPBo5yjdQ@mail.gmail.com> <31939_1470204015_57A1886F_31939_1565_1_20160803075954.35914021394d6c3f9b3802f3@aei.mpg.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:59:54 +0200 Gerrit K=FChn <gerrit.kuehn@aei.mpg.de> wrote about Re: NFS on 10G interfaces still painfully slow: GK> 1048576000 bytes transferred in 1.403620 secs (747051194 bytes/sec) GK> 1048576000 bytes transferred in 1.380546 secs (759537249 bytes/sec) Argh! ;-) Obviously, I cannot read and miscounted the number of digits. I should have read the seconds instead. 750MB/s is still not the maximum, but totally fine for my purposes here. Reverting step-by-step all the things I tried yesterday, it looks like disabling the sync on the zfs volume gave the biggest performance boost, and I simply overlooked the extra digit when it went from 25MB/s or so to 750MB/s. Sorry for the noise... cu Gerrit
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160803085459.273a26404c4d37ee6b7e2b6f>