Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:45:37 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim <darren.pilgrim@bitfreak.org> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New version of iwi(4) - Call for testers [regression!] Message-ID: <441F84F1.4090303@bitfreak.org> In-Reply-To: <200603210038.28520.max@love2party.net> References: <E1FLRfM-000PcS-00._pppp-mail-ru@f11.mail.ru> <441F274D.1030107@bitfreak.org> <200603210038.28520.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Max Laier wrote: > > Let me clear up some things here: > 1) This is not "mine" driver. It's Damien's with a lot of patches that I hope > to test by putting out this version. My sincerest apologies to Damien and everyone involved. I was going by historical convention where when someone posts a new, out-of-tree driver or patch-set it's "theirs." Further following tradition, how does "iwiNG" sound? > 3) The aim is to merge the changes in "my" driver to CVS modulo regressions. > That is why I am mostly interested in side-by-side testing. I will put out a > new tarball later this week that will help with that. If you already did > some such testing, I'd be happy to hear your results. Using the stock driver, I get hard lock-ups during interface configuration, wpa_supplicant crashes, dhclient crashes, firmware "fatal errors" and device wedges that require a reboot. In the same world and kernel, the iwiNG driver has absolutely none of these problems.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?441F84F1.4090303>