Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:10:17 +0200 From: Thomas Quinot <thomas@FreeBSD.ORG> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren?= Schmidt <sos@DeepCore.dk> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: atapicam(4) as KLD? Message-ID: <20041019171017.GA33445@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <4175497F.2000501@DeepCore.dk> References: <20041013205141.GA874@galgenberg.net> <416DA856.9040703@vbservices.net> <20041015093908.GA11176@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <20041018234324.GA1270@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <4174B366.9010508@DeepCore.dk> <20041019165749.GA33059@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <4175497F.2000501@DeepCore.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Søren Schmidt, 2004-10-19 :
> But I do, just adding in the atapicam glue add even more kludges which I
> dont want.
We are not talking of atapicam-specific glue or jkudges here, on the
contrary I am suggesting using the generic functions from the NEWBUS
frameworks to make ata behave as a proper bus *in place* of the ad hoc
atapicam glue.
> It was talked about on IRC long time ago in connection with making ATA
> truely modular.
Hmmm, OK, so let's consider that as completely lost since we have no
traces of it.
> helpfull for that purpose. I'll try to locate that tree in the woods
> here, maybe that could be turned into what we want.
> So, as usual, I'm working on it :/
Great, thanks! Please let me know if I can be of some help.
Thomas.
--
Thomas.Quinot@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041019171017.GA33445>