Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 12:36:00 -0500 (CDT) From: mikebo@tellabs.com To: davidg@Root.COM Cc: mikebo (Mike Borowiec), wollman@lcs.mit.edu, hackers@freebsd.org, bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.1.0-951020-SNAP: Major bug in NFS again! Message-ID: <199510271736.MAA00863@sunc210.tellabs.com> In-Reply-To: <199510271645.JAA00169@corbin.Root.COM> from "David Greenman" at Oct 27, 95 09:45:52 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David wrote: > >Garret wrote: > ... > >> No. Source address != interface. > ... > I think you might be confusing this a bit. As was said above, just because > the packet goes out an interface because of a prefered route doesn't mean that > it will have that interface's address. ... chop ... Dohhhhh! I see the light... been working with Suns too long. ;v) Can anyone point me at a document that describes the proper, 4.4BSD operation vs. the old, insecure method? I'm assuming this is an RFC or architectural paper? Thanks everyone for your patience. - Mike -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael Borowiec - mikebo@tellabs.com - Tellabs Operations Inc. Senior Member of Technical Staff 4951 Indiana Avenue, MS 63 708-512-8211 FAX: 708-512-7099 Lisle, IL 60532 USA --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510271736.MAA00863>