Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:50:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>, kby@freebsd.org, bp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysctl filesystem ? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206261049570.1828@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <CADLo83_hLe-MUJASLmx%2B8MBj12LOQ_-gsmWNjpzvzZdxwEgStw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CACqU3MXaa0R7fG6Q-EqS3h8PJh__tzNeugBxVyqKHxsCR-wTuQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206260805450.3572@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CADLo83_hLe-MUJASLmx%2B8MBj12LOQ_-gsmWNjpzvzZdxwEgStw@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> > > > as well as we don't depend of /proc for normal operation we shouldn't for say /proc/sysctl > > > > improvements are welcome, better documentation is welcome, changes to what is OK - isn't. > > /proc/sysctl might be useful. Just because Linux uses it doesn't make it a bad idea. actually - i don't know since over 5 years what linux do.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206261049570.1828>