Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:59:38 -0600 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: parv@pair.com Cc: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>, "Kirk R. Wythers" <kwythers@umn.edu>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: can't build mozilla 0.9.9 Message-ID: <20020326215938.GB5747@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20020326215852.GA64207@moo.holy.cow> References: <1016545979.58281.2.camel@lorax.forestry.umn.edu> <1016555176.299.4.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <20020326215852.GA64207@moo.holy.cow>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
In the last episode (Mar 26), parv@pair.com said:
> not so. i have freetype-1.3.1_1 & freetype-2.0.9 installed, yet
> mozilla build fails w/ the same messsage as above. ports tree is
> up to date as of 2002.03.26 05:10:57 utc.
>
> or does having freetype-1.3.1_2 instead of freetype-1.3.1_1 really
> makes a difference?
Yes, you definitely need freetype-1.3.1_2.
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/print/freetype/Makefile,v :
revision 1.25
date: 2002/03/14 11:15:03; author: sobomax; state: Exp; lines: +2 -2
Install includes into ${PREFIX}/include/freetype1/freetype instead of
${PREFIX}/include/freetype, so that ports that want freetype2 but don't
pay particular attention to the order of `-I' directives won't be screwed
if freetype1 is occasionally installed on the same system. This should
fix recent problems with Mozilla.
Bump PORTREVISION.
--
Dan Nelson
dnelson@allantgroup.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020326215938.GB5747>