Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 20:26:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Snob Art Genre <benedict@echonyc.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is tickadj still required in -CURRENT ? Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.02.9810082024490.17109-100000@echonyc.com> In-Reply-To: <3256.907891423@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > It's been more of a code slush, and the rule still nonetheless in > effect seems to be "bring it in if it's not too scarey OR if it > represents something we really need to get out of the way before 3.0, > or it will be more painful after." That still leaves a large number > of things which are being deliberately postponed until after 3.0. > They'd be nice to have, but we don't have an urgent need to cross the > bridges they represent at this particular time. So when is someone going to look at the reproducible, fully documented, weeks-old filesystem bug I posted to this list two days ago? Would a send-pr help? Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.02.9810082024490.17109-100000>