Date: Fri, 6 Oct 1995 20:42:38 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu> Cc: CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, ache@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/ncftp2/pkg COMMENT Message-ID: <WlEgMTmOW2@ache.dialup.demos.ru> In-Reply-To: <199510060219.TAA18882@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU>; from Satoshi Asami at Thu, 5 Oct 1995 19:19:42 -0700 References: <199510060219.TAA18882@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199510060219.TAA18882@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU> Satoshi
Asami writes:
> * It is neccessary in this case, this version merges some local FreeBSD hacks
> * and filename completion into official stream minimize potential
> * problems which can occurse.
>I don't understand. We had a perfectly functional 2.1.1 port, with
>"local hacks". What "potential problems" can occur by leaving it that
>way?
There was filename completion stuff written by third person. I beleive
more in author's way of its integration than in way that we have before.
>I'll let this one go, but please keep changes to the minimum, okay?
>You always seem to trample on other people's feet come release time,
>and I'm frankly getting a little annoyed by that.
I just try to commit neccessary things before release will go.
I don't plan any additional ports actions right now (expect
things you asked me).
--
Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed,
ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead -
FidoNet: 2:5020/230.3 : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead.
RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?WlEgMTmOW2>