Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 18:03:16 +0000 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 9b8db66402e9 - main - netgraph: provide separate malloc type for nodes that are missing it Message-ID: <ZloQ5HpJa27AWVP4@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <202405311620.44VGK2xX033356@gitrepo.freebsd.org> References: <202405311620.44VGK2xX033356@gitrepo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 04:20:02PM +0000, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > The branch main has been updated by glebius: > > URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=9b8db66402e94919ab47fc2d69863968e49e305a > > commit 9b8db66402e94919ab47fc2d69863968e49e305a > Author: Dmitry Lukhtionov <dmitryluhtionov@gmail.com> > AuthorDate: 2024-05-31 16:19:54 +0000 > Commit: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> > CommitDate: 2024-05-31 16:19:54 +0000 > > netgraph: provide separate malloc type for nodes that are missing it > > The kernel option NG_SEPARATE_MALLOC helps to debug memory leaks in > netgraph(4). Several nodes were missing the support. I realize this commit didn't create the option, but is there really enough of a cost to having multiple malloc types to justify an option at all? -- Brooks
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ZloQ5HpJa27AWVP4>