Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 10:49:04 -0700 From: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: /usr/portsnap vs. /var/db/portsnap Message-ID: <42F64990.4090005@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <42F646B9.7020703@samsco.org> References: <42F47C0D.2020704@freebsd.org> <20050806092232.GA850@zaphod.nitro.dk> <42F489DC.1080400@freebsd.org> <20050807115927.GA851@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20050807173003.GA7290@soaustin.net> <42F646B9.7020703@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott Long wrote: > I think that portsnap is a very good feature and I'm ready to tout it > for the 6.0 release. The technical problems, such as they are, are > pretty insignificant and are just about solved. Umm... *shuffles feet*... I wasn't planning on having portsnap in the base system for FreeBSD 6.0. I'd rather give it a couple of months to settle in and MFC it before FreeBSD 5.5 and FreeBSD 6.1. People can always install it from the ports tree until then. Unless you really want an insta-MFC in the middle of a release freeze, of course... Colin Percival
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42F64990.4090005>