Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:11:06 +0100 (BST) From: george graham <geordie250@yahoo.co.uk> To: Thomas Quinot <thomas@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Søren" Schmidt <sos@DeepCore.dk> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: atapicam(4) as KLD? Message-ID: <20041019171106.13959.qmail@web90108.mail.scd.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20041019165749.GA33059@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Me too. Thomas Quinot <thomas@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote:* Søren Schmidt, 2004-10-19 : > Well, if we need to go the newbus way, we need to do it completely, ie > get the ATA devices etc tied in that way as well. I agree that this would be nice, but I do not see it as a prerequisite to modularizing atapicam. > know there has been a couble of others looking into this, so now is the > time to chime in if thats the case. Where are we standing with this effort? Who is working on it currently, and what has been implemented already? Thomas. -- Thomas.Quinot@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --------------------------------- ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041019171106.13959.qmail>