Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:40:32 -0800 From: Navdeep Parhar <np@FreeBSD.org> To: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org>, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r276485 - in head/sys: conf dev/cxgbe modules/cxgbe/if_cxgbe Message-ID: <54BF0390.8070003@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <54BF01F2.4030502@FreeBSD.org> References: <201412312319.sBVNJHca031041@svn.freebsd.org> <CA%2BhQ2%2Bh29RObCONCd8Nu_W92CnJ9jHMZdRBqiU9hu78D3SwUDA@mail.gmail.com> <20150106203344.GB26068@ox> <54BEE07A.3070207@FreeBSD.org> <54BEE305.6020905@FreeBSD.org> <54BEF7CF.9030505@FreeBSD.org> <54BEFB79.6090806@FreeBSD.org> <54BF01F2.4030502@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/20/15 17:33, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > On 01/20/15 20:06, Navdeep Parhar wrote: >> On 01/20/15 16:50, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >>> >>> On 01/20/15 18:21, Navdeep Parhar wrote: >>>> The problem reported by Luigi has been fixed in r277225 already. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Navdeep >>>> >>> >>> But the fix is rather ugly, isn't it? I would personally prefer to just >>> kill the older >>> gcc but in the meantime updating it so that it behaves like the updated >>> gcc/clang would be better. IMHO. >> >> I'm not sure why you think the fix is ugly. Modifying the base >> compiler to deal with minor stuff like this seems excessive and I >> never even considered that. >> > > "Modifying the base compiler to deal with minor stuff like this" is > actually called > "an update" since upstream already did it: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10676 > > You could also call it "making it more compatible with clang and newer gcc" > > The base compiler is ugly as it can be but that's upstream's fault, not > the fault > those of us that were once condemned to add bandaids. Happily I am not > planning to touch it anymore ;). I'm not planning to touch it at all, and I'm happy too :-) Regards, Navdeep > > Pedro. > > >> Regards, >> Navdeep >> >>> >>> Pedro. >>> >>>> On 01/20/15 15:10, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >>>>> Hi; >>>>> >>>>> I got this patch from the OpenBSD-tech list[1]. >>>>> Perhaps this fixes the gcc issue? >>>>> >>>>> Apparently it's required for mesa too. >>>>> >>>>> Pedro. >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/40604 >>>>>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54BF0390.8070003>