Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1998 17:33:55 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: ben@rosengart.com Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is tickadj still required in -CURRENT ? Message-ID: <3456.907893235@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 08 Oct 1998 20:26:20 EDT." <Pine.GSO.4.02.9810082024490.17109-100000@echonyc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> So when is someone going to look at the reproducible, fully documented, > weeks-old filesystem bug I posted to this list two days ago? Would a > send-pr help? Of course a send-pr would help. Posting a problem to the list is like saying "if someone has time right this second to look at this, please do so, otherwise just ignore it" since once a message is in the archives, it's effectively gone from people's sight. Some folks might also claim this effect is the same for PRs, but I've seen a lot more PRs, of varying ages, revived and dealt with than I ever have seen with postings. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3456.907893235>