Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:34:13 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> To: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.database.mk Message-ID: <20051111183413.5e70164b@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20051111161350.GA12336@soaustin.net> References: <200511111029.jABATMW9087903@repoman.freebsd.org> <20051111133654.53679f43@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20051111161350.GA12336@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:13:50 -0600 linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 01:36:54PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > Can we be _consistent_ in respect of the *_DATABASE* variables ? E.g. > > BROKEN_WITH_DATABASE (it should be a enumeration and work for > > all databases) > > Please, if we do this, let's fix the bug that BROKEN is set instead > of IGNORE in these cases. So you want to call it IGNORE_WITH_DATABASE or just set INGNORE instead of BROKEN ? -- IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #418: Sysadmins busy fighting SPAM
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051111183413.5e70164b>