Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 22:43:57 -0800 From: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> To: Andy Farkas <andyf@andyit.com.au> Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: devel/check Message-ID: <CAN6yY1s5ov=YhdQbUuHkKLeDW1KKB2cfjWygQZ8rA1NLVe0--w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <589F9E93.3070100@andyit.com.au> References: <589F8806.7000605@andyit.com.au> <86y3xcgxrf.wl-herbert@mailbox.org> <589F96F6.7040703@andyit.com.au> <a190656c-d3a2-42b8-ed39-23274c9927d7@FreeBSD.org> <589F996D.8020907@andyit.com.au> <20170211232421.1be293d1@gumby.homeunix.com> <589F9E93.3070100@andyit.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Andy Farkas <andyf@andyit.com.au> wrote: > On 12/02/2017 09:24, RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > > It doesn't, pkg-delete is just the documentation for "pkg delete". >> >> > My proposal is that the man page for pkg(8) should state this. > > -andyf First, the pkg(8) page should explicitly state that there are man pages for each pkg command. Since this is NOT a typical FreeBSD practice, it is a POLA violation to not make it clear. Second, the '-f' option does delete libcheck. Does installing devel/check cleanly fix up unresolved dependencies? If not, use of -o is the right answer. I'll admit that I m not sure. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1s5ov=YhdQbUuHkKLeDW1KKB2cfjWygQZ8rA1NLVe0--w>