Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 14:27:28 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: Maho NAKATA <chat95@mac.com>, office@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Eliminating use of _GCC_BUILD_DEPENDS from openoffice-3-devel Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1211041424080.2266@tuna.site> In-Reply-To: <20121104.191451.521517611141082684.chat95@mac.com> References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1210132323540.2739@tuna.site> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1211031717260.2266@tuna.site> <20121104.191451.521517611141082684.chat95@mac.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sun, 4 Nov 2012, Maho NAKATA wrote:
>> I now applied this based on maintainer timeout (3 weeks).
> Sorry I have just missed your e-mail...
Are you fine with me applying the same (hopefully temporary)
cleanup patch to openoffice-3 (non-devel)?
>> Is there any chance we can work on this together and identify why
>> you felt it was necessary in the first place? For, it should not,
>> and rather just work with the standards ports infrastructure.
> If I remember correctly, it is needed for libgcc_s.so and/r libstdc++.so
> linked correctly.
>
> Now I'm checking without it. Yes, of course it's dirty and should be
> eliminated. However, at least, my attempt failed by lang/gcc47 by a
> different reason (bash segfaulted somehow).
I looked into this from my end. In Mk/bsd.gcc.mk we have the
following
_GCC_RUNTIME:= ${LOCALBASE}/lib/gcc${V}
CFLAGS+= -Wl,-rpath=${_GCC_RUNTIME}
LDFLAGS+= -Wl,-rpath=${_GCC_RUNTIME}
which should make the code in openoffice-3-devel/Makefile unnecessary.
Except, if OpenOffice is building C++ code, do we need to set another
flag perhaps? Such as CXXFLAGS with the same? I'd be happy to add
that if it helps.
If it does not make a difference, then is OpenOffice ignoring these
standard flags? If so, that would be an OpenOffice bug. Can you
address it there in case?
Gerald
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LNX.2.00.1211041424080.2266>