Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 15:28:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> Cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.ORG>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, Alan DeKok <aland@freeradius.org> Subject: Re: Fwd: [Status of FreeRADIUS in the ports collection] Message-ID: <200205021928.g42JSe4Q022657@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <200205021800.g42I0vVa089809@cwsys.cwsent.com> References: <nectar@FreeBSD.ORG> <20020502165028.GB16240@madman.nectar.cc> <200205021800.g42I0vVa089809@cwsys.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Thu, 02 May 2002 11:00:57 -0700, Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> said: > If the maintainer doesn't object, I can put it on my list of things to > do. I do not at all object. This has been on my plate (particularly with respect to fixing the broken Kerberos bits) for a long time now, and every time I try to work on it, I end up pulling my hair in frustration and moving on to something more productive, like reading netnews. > I do however think that instead of using the nightly snapshot, > which can make the port obsolete in one evening, we should use the > latest public beta (0.5). At the time the port was created, the snapshot was all there was. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200205021928.g42JSe4Q022657>