Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 17:12:06 -0800 From: Studded <Studded@dal.net> To: Matthew Thyer <thyerm@camtech.net.au> Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: trouble booting Message-ID: <3509D966.DAE44397@dal.net> References: <Pine.BSI.3.96.980313092857.24726A-100000@gloria.cord.edu> <3509C8D7.60F8C892@camtech.net.au> <3509CB68.C87849FA@camtech.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Thyer wrote: > I always make a new kernel, boot on it and then make world. I'm curious about this. This isn't a dig, although my incredulity might make it seem so. Every piece of documentation I've seen says to do it the other way around. Make world first, then build kernel, then boot. Experience tells me that this is a good thing, and there have been numerous changes made in the past that require you to build the world first (like ipfw). So the question is, why do you build the kernel first? What advantage do you think it will provide? Curious, Doug -- *** Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network *** *** Proud operator, designer and maintainer of the world's largest *** Internet Relay Chat server. 5,328 clients and still growing. *** Try spider.dal.net on ports 6662-4 (Powered by FreeBSD) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3509D966.DAE44397>