Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:59:16 +0000 From: CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl> To: d@delphij.net Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, delphij@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/164290: FreeBSD 9.0 IS NOT YET PRODUCTION/STABLE Message-ID: <CAFYkXjnnoem1kU1Ae_GHJrFW7m1mHACHa%2B4nPn=s07Tbanv=Nw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F173ADE.5030606@delphij.net> References: <201201182118.q0ILIYaq079339@freefall.freebsd.org> <CAFYkXj=s_bOqEjxitGLz-cXMsebWaNqtRS2B2=ST4EzKk4oc3w@mail.gmail.com> <4F173ADE.5030606@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
ok, maybe it would be more convenient to still mark 8.2 as production and wait until most 9.0 issues are solved, then mark it as production..? :-) i always liked this logical consequence of freebsd, when something was stable it was stable, otherwise it was devel. right now it seems to mark devel as stable just as linux does which i dont like :-) also i dont like changing the good stuff only to make things "new" just as the bsdinsytall replaced good sysinstall. aren't there any more important things to work on? :-) best regards :-) tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFYkXjnnoem1kU1Ae_GHJrFW7m1mHACHa%2B4nPn=s07Tbanv=Nw>