Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:55:04 -0800 From: Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portsnap is now in the base system Message-ID: <20060116175526.GA25023@lizzy.catnook.local> In-Reply-To: <43CB8E90.8090902@suutari.iki.fi> References: <42F871B4.6000703@freebsd.org> <200601161324.57292.nike_d@cytexbg.com> <43CB8E90.8090902@suutari.iki.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 02:16:16PM +0200, Ari Suutari wrote: > >On Tuesday 09 August 2005 12:04, Colin Percival wrote: > >>About 12 hours ago I committed portsnap to HEAD. From the commit log: > >> > >> Add portsnap to the base system. This is a secure, easy to use, > >> fast, lightweight, and generally good way for users to keep their > >> ports trees up to date. > >> > > Is there an utility (cvsup-replacement) like this for base system sources ? See csup: http://mu.org/~mux/csup.html. But it's not ready yet. -- Jos Backus jos at catnook.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060116175526.GA25023>