Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:44:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@FreeBSD.org> To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit: r206487 - head/usr.bin/tar Message-ID: <201004111844.o3BIigLU079853@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Author: kientzle Date: Sun Apr 11 18:44:42 2010 New Revision: 206487 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/206487 Log: If a file is specifically both included and excluded, then: * It is not extracted (because it is excluded) * If it's not present in the archive, then an error is reported (because the file was requested and not found) * If it is present in the archive, no error is reported. Previously, this would always report an error because the exclusion prevented the entry from matching the inclusion. Also, tar is now more reluctant to report unmatched inclusions. Previously, "tar x file1 'file*'" against an archive that contained a single entry "file1" would match file1 and then report an error for the second pattern because it wasn't matched. It now considers both inclusions to be matched and reports no error. Modified: head/usr.bin/tar/matching.c Modified: head/usr.bin/tar/matching.c ============================================================================== --- head/usr.bin/tar/matching.c Sun Apr 11 18:41:31 2010 (r206486) +++ head/usr.bin/tar/matching.c Sun Apr 11 18:44:42 2010 (r206487) @@ -156,40 +156,41 @@ lafe_excluded(struct lafe_matching *matc if (matching == NULL) return (0); + /* Mark off any unmatched inclusions. */ + /* In particular, if a filename does appear in the archive and + * is explicitly included and excluded, then we don't report + * it as missing even though we don't extract it. + */ + matched = NULL; + for (match = matching->inclusions; match != NULL; match = match->next){ + if (match->matches == 0 + && match_inclusion(match, pathname)) { + matching->inclusions_unmatched_count--; + match->matches++; + matched = match; + } + } + /* Exclusions take priority */ for (match = matching->exclusions; match != NULL; match = match->next){ if (match_exclusion(match, pathname)) return (1); } - /* Then check for inclusions */ - matched = NULL; + /* It's not excluded and we found an inclusion above, so it's included. */ + if (matched != NULL) + return (0); + + + /* We didn't find an unmatched inclusion, check the remaining ones. */ for (match = matching->inclusions; match != NULL; match = match->next){ - if (match_inclusion(match, pathname)) { - /* - * If this pattern has never been matched, - * then we're done. - */ - if (match->matches == 0) { - match->matches++; - matching->inclusions_unmatched_count--; - return (0); - } - /* - * Otherwise, remember the match but keep checking - * in case we can tick off an unmatched pattern. - */ - matched = match; + /* We looked at previously-unmatched inclusions already. */ + if (match->matches > 0 + && match_inclusion(match, pathname)) { + match->matches++; + return (0); } } - /* - * We didn't find a pattern that had never been matched, but - * we did find a match, so count it and exit. - */ - if (matched != NULL) { - matched->matches++; - return (0); - } /* If there were inclusions, default is to exclude. */ if (matching->inclusions != NULL)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201004111844.o3BIigLU079853>