Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 19:16:08 +0000 From: "Robert N. M. Watson" <rwatson@freebsd.org> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Mikolaj Golub <trociny@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unix domain sockets on nullfs(5) Message-ID: <8B0B7D86-1EE6-4901-9E36-EA1918315163@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20120225174818.GC55074@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <CAOnPXZ_y5G6uEBWmfuH7qYBh%2B4Pw=O91ztCPEFCOTzWdCzx%2BRA@mail.gmail.com> <BBDE763A-F55E-453D-A503-2489C9040EF6@freebsd.org> <20120112215106.GC31224@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <86hazntwmu.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20120123031238.GL31224@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <86zkcfu9ac.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20120218215003.GM3283@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <86ehtrf8qf.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20120219170151.GS3283@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <86d393dvqr.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20120225174818.GC55074@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 25 Feb 2012, at 17:48, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> I am thinking now about 'MFC after'. Thanks to jhb's spare vops it looks like >> it is possible to merge it in stable/9 without breaking the KBI, but then I >> will consume 3 of 5 available spare vops. So is it worth doing? > I do not think that we shall be so restrained on the use of spare VOPs. I think the only real question here is whether John had specific things in mind when he added the spares, or whether they are open for general use. Assuming they are open for general use, this use seems a quite beneficial one :-). Roberthome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8B0B7D86-1EE6-4901-9E36-EA1918315163>