Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 19:16:08 +0000 From: "Robert N. M. Watson" <rwatson@freebsd.org> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Mikolaj Golub <trociny@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unix domain sockets on nullfs(5) Message-ID: <8B0B7D86-1EE6-4901-9E36-EA1918315163@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20120225174818.GC55074@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <CAOnPXZ_y5G6uEBWmfuH7qYBh%2B4Pw=O91ztCPEFCOTzWdCzx%2BRA@mail.gmail.com> <BBDE763A-F55E-453D-A503-2489C9040EF6@freebsd.org> <20120112215106.GC31224@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <86hazntwmu.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20120123031238.GL31224@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <86zkcfu9ac.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20120218215003.GM3283@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <86ehtrf8qf.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20120219170151.GS3283@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <86d393dvqr.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20120225174818.GC55074@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 Feb 2012, at 17:48, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> I am thinking now about 'MFC after'. Thanks to jhb's spare vops it = looks like >> it is possible to merge it in stable/9 without breaking the KBI, but = then I >> will consume 3 of 5 available spare vops. So is it worth doing? > I do not think that we shall be so restrained on the use of spare = VOPs. I think the only real question here is whether John had specific things = in mind when he added the spares, or whether they are open for general = use. Assuming they are open for general use, this use seems a quite = beneficial one :-). Robert=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8B0B7D86-1EE6-4901-9E36-EA1918315163>