Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 10:07:37 -0700 From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org> To: George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com> Cc: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>, "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" <testing@freebsd.org>, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A new way to test systems in multiple machine scenarios... Message-ID: <CAG=rPVejVOmyQQY1XM2uUXBoMoxAwi_0j6KzmxqyPzgnNvyroQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <F470785E-F01E-48D3-BF5C-2C5E38181A1D@neville-neil.com> References: <B8265086-6875-46A3-BE90-E286CD5066E2@neville-neil.com> <CAG=rPVfREbmv7W465B68HoU8_ig=Y2f_w9_-PL7f2T_bzeAyiQ@mail.gmail.com> <154F5C90-B0A5-41AD-ABBC-C7ECE1281D7D@gmail.com> <F470785E-F01E-48D3-BF5C-2C5E38181A1D@neville-neil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:21 AM, George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com> wrote: > This, actually, is the problem I found. Lots of folks have partial > solutions that are either proprietary, > internal, not read for prime time, not quite what we want, etc. etc. I > did get one private > response of another system to look at as well. > > I basically did this as a stake in the ground around which to build > something we could possibly move forwards > with. It's not a 100% solution but it's 80% of the solution to the > problem I run into 80% of the time. > You are absolutely right. Many companies have internal testing frameworks that are home-grown and proprietary. It's great for the individual company, but doesn't help people in the larger community. Since you put this stuff in github, I encourage folks to hack on the code and send pull requests to George to help improve it! -- Craig
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAG=rPVejVOmyQQY1XM2uUXBoMoxAwi_0j6KzmxqyPzgnNvyroQ>