Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 03:01:22 -0500 From: "Allen Smith" <easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu> To: Studded <Studded@gorean.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is 'xntpd' broken in -stable? Message-ID: <9901120301.ZM2476@beatrice.rutgers.edu> In-Reply-To: Studded <Studded@gorean.org> "Re: Is 'xntpd' broken in -stable?" (Oct 25, 4:14am) References: <199810091927.MAA14061@implode.root.com> <9810241606.ZM2203@beatrice.rutgers.edu> <3632EBD7.717C0B6F@gorean.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 25, 4:14am, Studded (possibly) wrote: Sorry about the delay... > Allen Smith wrote: > > > I've checked with Dave Mills on this issue, and there's an option (-x, > > which is unfortunately not in the help files) in ntpd (as opposed to > > xntpd, which is about as obsolete/nonsupported as FreeBSD-1.x) I apologize for exaggerating. It's more like FreeBSD-2.1. > Posted this on another list...I disagree with your characterization as > much as I'd like to see our version of xntpd updated. The xntpd branch > is still maintained and updated, as recently as 4/27/98 for the most > recent stable version, and August 10th for the most recent beta. Well... currently, Dave Mills has stated that they aren't maintaining xntpd any longer; any updates are through patches they've accepted, but have not necessarily done testing on. ntpd-4.0.91 appears sufficiently stable that they're going to make it into ntpd-4.1 and an official 'release' pretty soon. -Allen -- Allen Smith easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9901120301.ZM2476>