Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Apr 2005 02:04:54 -0400
From:      Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>
To:        obrien@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabextract Makefile ports/archivers/dact Makefile ports/archivers/star Makefile ports/archivers/arj Makefile ports/archivers/tardy ...
Message-ID:  <425B6506.5000309@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050412055628.GA6385@dragon.NUXI.org>
References:  <200504110804.j3B84fNs060515@repoman.freebsd.org> <200504120603.10518.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <20050412055628.GA6385@dragon.NUXI.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:03:04AM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> 
>>On Monday, 11. April 2005 10:04, David E. O'Brien wrote:
>>
>>I'm not familiar with the crossbuilding logic in FreeBSD, so could somebody 
>>who is make a definitive statement which of the two variables is 
>>crossbuild-safe and then proceed to change the respective bits in the 
>>porter's handbook and bsd.port.mk accordingly?
> 
> 
> I would be good to have the two copies of documentation to agree.

When does ${MACHINE_ARCH} != ${ARCH}?

# Adam


-- 

Adam Weinberger
adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org
adamw@vectors.cx    ||   adamw@gnome.org
http://www.vectors.cx



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?425B6506.5000309>