Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:12:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (was Re: Stuck in "objtrm") Message-ID: <199907121812.OAA79735@misha.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <199907121741.KAA17837@ducky.net> from Mike Haertel at "Jul 12, 1999 10:41:26 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Haertel once wrote: > Anyway, taking all that into account, I still agree with Dillon that > it is a better software solution to allow the same loadable drivers to > work for both UP and MP systems whenever possible. What's wrong, again with /modules and /modules.smp? If some third party only wants to provide ONE module, they can provide the smp one, right? The open-source ones, should be compileable one way or the other. The new hardware is so much faster for the benefit of applications, not the kernel :) -mi (without plans to retire his 486 and P90 anytime soon) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907121812.OAA79735>